ERPZ Stop Mugging. Start Learning.

24Apr/120

Wasted Eureka

By Kevin

Once again, another batch of students are encountering Project Work for the first time in their lives and fearing for it. I'm looking into the two questions and providing a bit of guidance on how to go about tackling them much like what I did for the students last year (here and here).

Paro the Seal

Seal that heals

This year's question follows the standard PW format; which goes by the 'research-then-implement' structure. The point is always to get you to study a particular issue/topic/area and then make use of your findings to design an implementable plan with specific actions. Likewise, both questions are usually similar or overlapping to a certain extent. They are quite general as usual and allows much room and space for creativity - something we Singaporeans seem to be mocked for lacking.

The Eureka Moment

Aim
This project task encourages you to explore the world of invention and/or discovery in a particular field and then use your findings to benefit the community

Task Requirements
Identify an invention/discovery in a particular field (eg. in science and technology, medicine, transport, design and construction, consumer goods and services, etc.) and show what its impact has been.

Suggest how your chosen invention/discovery could be adapted to meet a need in the community.

This first question deal with inventions or discovery and obviously you have lots of them to choose from; select something you're interested in and with information available, preferably something that has been implemented somewhere or tried out and you can use the results of the trial to justify your plan. I would advise you to start off with identifying the invention/discovery before trying to think of a need in the community to be met by it. Starting with the need could be challenging. Once you've got your invention/discovery; ask yourself the following:

  • What are the impacts of the discovery/invention?
  • What is the original motivation/intent behind the discovery or invention?
  • How is it applied in the real world? Does it solve a problem, improve on an aspect of life?
  • Who does the invention/discovery help? Where and when was it used?
  • Is there any side-effects, unintended consequences, dangers?
  • Can the invention/discovery be adapted to a similar community in Singapore or around us? How can you reduce any risk that comes with applying the invention/discovery? What kind of difference can you make with this adoption?

Something interesting people might want to look into is that of robots; I recently took notice of this invention, 'Paro the seal', which is a social robot designed to accompany elderly. It could meet the need of an ageing population with lonely elderly folks perhaps. And Sherry Turkle voiced some concerns about this.

Now we move on to the next task option.

Waste Not, Want Not

Aim
This project task encourages you to consider the issue of wastage in a particular area and to suggest ways to reducing such wastage.

Task Requirements
Identify an area (eg. of any natural resource, money, time, food, opportunity, etc.) where wastage takes place and show the present and future impact of such wastage.

Draw up a plan to highlight the problem to a specific group in the community and suggest ways in which they might reduce the wastage.

Now this task deals more specifically with a kind of problem. Still, wastage can be on anything so there's much scope for exploration. 'Wasted opportunity' alone can practically be anything. Choose something that can be wasted but that waste can also be salvaged or put into some other better use then the way it is used now.

  • Why is it wasted at present? How does this waste arise? (Eg. Banana peels waste emerges from consumption of bananas)
  • How is the waste currently treated? Ignored/Disposed? Used but not efficiently?
  • Is there any residual value in the waste? Does the waste actually have value elsewhere? (Eg. Cow dung might be waste to the cow but fertilizers for the farmers)
  • Is there a mechanism for us to bring this residual value from one party (the one who wastes it) to the other (the one who needs it)?
  • Is there any cost involved in this transfer? Can we design a mechanism for that specific group in the community who can make use of the waste?
  • What would be the impact of reducing this wastage? Who benefits and how can the impact affect the society at large?
Reduced Price

Food Unwasted

Being based in London for my studies now; I could suggest looking into expired food and consumer products in supermarkets. You could do a project to survey the wasted perishable food that are disposed by supermarkets (like fresh vegetables, fruits, microwaved food, sushi, baked items, etc) every so often. And then a solution could be something like what is used in British supermarkets; that is to reduce the prices of these goods as they approach expiry date so that the supermarket can clear the stocks while recouping some of their cost and reduce wastage at the same time. I have not seen this in supermarkets in Singapore so it might be worthy to look into this.

Please try not to end up copying the suggested ideas because if you can see this post, a thousand over other students or more would see it and your tutors too, would be able to see this set of guidance and possibly use it for their class.

All the best!

22Apr/11Off

PW Season

By Kevin

Risks

Take the right risks...

I guess it's the Project Work season again and it'll be worth your while to check out our PW page for some generic advice. This year, I'm glad to be able to offer some of my personal take on the question and the potential ideas and approaches. This could possibly the most useful piece on PW that ERPZ can offer for this year.

I shall first tackle Task 1, 'Risk'; it is not too tough and usually, PW questions are given so that you have a lot of room to explore different things. Which is wonderful.

Aim
This project task encourages you to took at the idea of risk and then show how risk-taking might affect people.

Task Requirements
Choose one example of risk-taking (in history, business, environmental studies, science, etc.), show how the need to take specific risks arose and analyse the positive and negative effects which resulted from the actions taken.

Suggest how lessons learned might be used to guide similar risk-taking in the future by individuals and/or groups.

There is a whole load of cases and examples out there for risk-taking and risky behaviours so just take your pick and then try and analyse each of the cases carefully. Ask yourself some of these questions:

  • What are the impacts of the action taken?
  • What is the agenda of the risk-takers?
  • Think abt how the risk-taking has been coordinated.
  • What're the aspects within their control and how did they manage these aspects?
  • What are the aspects they couldnt control and how they take actions to cover up down-side risks or prevent undesirable outcomes?
  • Use all these different parts to piece together the lessons and come up with a sort of 'guideline' or training programme

Comments are welcomed though students should not expect me to be guiding them on their specific projects.

18Apr/10Off

Evaluating Articles

By Martin See

Research Writing

Who did the writing?

You can hear the fashionable phrase research skills widely bandied about these days. The phrase amounts to doing your homework on a certain research topic, which includes finding out as much relevant information as possible by going through the existing literature, be it in paper or digital formats. It does not matter whether you are a student working on your project paper or an employee writing your report; you will constantly require these skills to excel in your work because every argument that you make or every suggestion that you raise ideally requires you to do research on them and to include current literature on those points. Note the use of the word skills in the previous sentences. Being skills, they can be learnt. This article will help you to improve an area of these skills, namely the ability to evaluate articles or sources in your work.

When you are evaluating your articles or sources, you may want to consider these key points:

a) Peer reviews
Most credible articles are peer reviewed by qualified experts in the relevant fields. It means that before the articles are published, they are subjected to intense scrutiny from their fellow colleagues, researchers, and other experts. An article published in Science, the academic journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, would obviously have gone through more processes of regulations and checks as compared to one published in ERPZ (a really unfortunate example). The more rigorous the peer reviews, the more credible the articles will be.

b) Authorship
Before you consider any ideas/arguments made in a paper, always do a thorough research on the author. Is the author a qualified expert in the field of study? An article on the physics of fluids by a well known economist is probably a dubious work. A general rule of thumb is to use the works of authors who are authorities in the relevant research fields. You may also want to consider if the authors have any personal agendas. You are less likely, for example, to believe in a glowing report on the financial stability of Yahoo! if it is prepared by an analyst with a heavy portfolio in Yahoo! shares as compared to an independent financial institution. Some research papers may also be heavily funded by some particular organisations and this may have significant bearing on the conclusions in the paper. Would you trust a health report on the effects of smoking if it was funded by Philip Morris? It is, therefore, important to consider the authors of the articles that you are using in your work.

c) Context
Every paper or every work is written and published in different contexts. If you want a contemporary view of World War I, you would probably not want to pick a book published in the 1920s, the post-era. So carefully consider the contexts of articles before you use them in your work.

d) Recency
When you use an article or source in your work, you would want the most recent idea/argument (assuming that the quality is the same in the comparison) except in special circumstances (e.g. history). This is especially relevant if the ideas/arguments are made obsolete rapidly, such as in the industry of information technology (IT). Unless the old articles offers an unique viewpoint, it would be better off for you to find recent articles to use for your work. As a general rule of thumb, stick to sources that are five years (or less) from your work. Imagine if a work is published in 2005, the research and the data involved in the work would most likely not be from 2005 but from 2003 or 2002. That is at least a gap of 7 years from your work (2010). A bigger gap would be more adverse and you would do well to avoid that in your work.

With all these considerations, I wish you all the best in your research! If you find that there are other considerations too, please share it with the ERPZ audience in the comments section.