ERPZ Stop Mugging. Start Learning.

1Dec/09Off

Holding Ideas

By Kevin

All at the same time...

All at the same time...

Some students struggle with social sciences and humanities like Economics, Geography and History because they think they can't hold two contradictory ideas at the same time and not take a side. Economist are somewhat famous for being able to do that and often criticized for being that way. As a matter of fact, humans are remarkably capable of doing that; we overrate our consistency of thought and the need for ideas that don't contradict. When we demand scientific proofs for certain claims yet openly express faith in certain religious claims, we're adopting contradictory frameworks of proof.

The reason why these subjects require that we hold contradictory ideas or for us to withhold judgment of these ideas is the lack of a proper quantitative approach to evaluating them. We might be able to come up with pros and cons but we are unable to assign a positive figure to denote the value and significance of the pro and a corresponding negative figure for a con and then evaluate them in an accounting matrix that will tell you which is better and how much better. Any attempts at that will be subjective and arbitrary anyways. As a result, it is important that students of these subjects hold on to them without judging but maintain the ability to dissect and analyse these ideas, zoom into certain features and investigate different aspects of it when necessary. More importantly, we'll have to master our language and internalize the nuances of the typical jargons used in the field to discuss these observations we make.

As humans, we will definitely have preferences for some explanation over others as well as some outcomes over others and this is a reason behind all the disputes that social scientist usually have with each other, including high profile ones by economists. And worst, unlike sciences where there are experiments everyone can agree on to check their ideas and theories to discover 'the truth', the search for truths in social sciences have often ended in vain because of the dynamic nature of the field. Scientists might not agree before a discovery is confirmed (Linus Pauling, a super-Nobel laureate with 3 Nobel prizes famously believed that DNA's structure should be a Triple Helix) but once it is confirmed, we find little delusional souls continuing with their false beliefs unless they are ignorant of the confirmation. Economics had its share of control experiments that happened in the world, often by chance. Unfortunately, they can never be repeated perfectly and their results are never agreed upon by experts in the field.

This is not to say that the subjects offer little value to the world; in fact the dynamic nature of these fields mean that there is always questions to answer and things to explore readily. And that is why we need more people to be able to hold different ideas at the same time and have different opinions on the same issue under different sort of circumstances and be able to see the world this way.

28Nov/09Off

A Little Late

By Kevin

Send Immediately!

Send Immediately!

I almost totally forgot about the package this week! For a start, check out how exactly you should be reading stuff at all in order to be studying effectively. The articles that are linked there serves as good reads for your weekend although they're all from The Economist. Itay Talgam presented a great talk about leadership of conductors at TED.com.

In addition, I wrote something about choosing stuff to read again. Yea, that's all for this week. I'm pretty busy you see. Have a great weekend.

27Nov/09Off

To Read, or Not

By Kevin

Stacking Up...

Stacking Up...

It sometimes appear to me amazing how highly people think of textbooks and course books. It makes me feel like writing one; perhaps one that teaches people when they should be using their textbooks. A textbook is basically course material that is used to teach you on a subject and when you have learnt about the stuff, there's little need to do a wholesale revisit, unless you're confident you've forgotten everything.

Why should you torture yourself by relearning everything you learnt and frustrating yourself with some minor definition deviations your memory have insisted upon and trying to 're-memorize' the 'right definition'? And more importantly, if you can learn the subject or whatever you're trying to learn without a textbook, why bother to get one?

A textbook has a couple of main uses, some of which concerns the students and others are mainly preoccupations of teachers and textbook writers. The functions students are usually concerned about are explanation and representations while those teachers are interested is includes those, and in addition, the standardization function. It's not difficult to see why this is so, students are hoping to learn something from the textbook; the explanations helps them understand and possibly provide them a means of explaining the concepts to themselves and others while the representation gives students a means of expressing the ideas and concept on paper (ie allowing them to take exams).

The teachers would love textbooks for those two facts since they relieve them somewhat of their teaching responsibilities but more importantly, it helps them standardize what their students learn and cope with queries that they might have. This is especially important for more contentious issues in the subject that has yet to be resolved by experts and the syllabus prescribes some default stand on the matter for time being.

As a student, one should see the textbook more as a guide than an authority and use it accordingly. Going through it once and understanding the concepts one seeks to master is basically all that the textbook should offer. A slow learner might revisit it a couple of times to grasp a concept or to master the explanations fully; and occasionally one could browse through it as a reference for the way they represent certain information (in the form of diagrams, charts and such) but it is difficult to gain anything more than that on repeated revisits to the textbook.

The ideal usage of a textbook is to synthesize the stuff from different sources together with it on your notes and chucking them aside when you're doing your revision - rely just on your personal notes (those that aggregate information from your readings of textbooks, your prescribed readings and lecture notes). Of course, this advice is more for students who revise consistently and are wholly familiar with the content which they're sitting an exam for.

23Nov/09Off

Practical Intelligence

By Kevin

Not Acting Smart

Not Acting Smart

I got to know about this book through a friend who was exploring topics that ranged from manipulating personality test results to acting smart in front of employers. It's a great boon that this is not the kind of book that teaches you to act smart. Karl Albrecht writes realistically about how we can go about making ourselves more intelligent in practical situations. There are many ideas in the book I've thought about previously but failed to put into concrete concepts as he did. I must say Karl did a wonderful job.

Like most of the other books on thinking, Karl discusses the make-up of the brains, the way different lobes on the brain controls different stuff and how they work together in concert and then he draws some meaningful speculation on the way we think. There are many speculations which are largely unproven in neuro-sciences but are well known in the field of psychology. Never mind the actual theories, Karl shows us how they might be useful for aiding us discover our mind's potential. He firms up the concept of 'Affirmative Thinking', which I think is a very important idea in our lives. We've cease to be gatekeepers of our mind in this media age, often pushed around, influenced by the people who are in turn controlled by others around as well as prevailing culture and fads. To accept that we are often being bombarded by thoughts and ideas of others and we often take them as if they're our own is the first step to controlling our thinking and helping us steer ourselves towards healthy thinking and mental habits.

Karl recommends simple methods to help us regain control of our minds and direct our attention so that we can tap on our mental habits, thinking preferences and styles to aid us with daily thinking, problem-solving and just plain existing in our complex world. I'm interested in the implication of Karl's ideas on education and learning. He has another book I'm looking forward to read, Social Intelligence, which he actually wrote before this book.

20Nov/09Off

Remembering Stuff

By Kevin

If only its that simple...

If only it's that simple...

It's been a long time since the previous entry; ERPZ have been very active with posts in the month of November generally but kind of stalled this moment. I've not written about studying techniques for a while now and I'm hoping to revisit it. Today's topic is somewhat related to memorizing stuff, something I almost never dwell on because I believe that when you understand something, you won't have to memorize it to remember it; the associations made in your brains when things you already know would help you anchor new concepts firmly in your mind. These associations can only be made because you understand the concepts.

The reality is that there might be many things that are not about understanding but pure memory. Alternatively, understanding may only come with exposure to an unrealistic amount of facts that would have to be remembered anyways. When that happens, we have to resort to 'memorizing'; a process we normally understand as 'getting stuff into the brain'. The question is how things normally enter our minds. The mind is a closed system which receives information only through the neurons and these cells in turn, receive the information they're transmitting through the sensory organs. In other words, our senses are the ultimate gateway to the mind and thus our memory.

Yet when we study, we often overtax our visual sense as we task it to commit things we read into memory. For some audio learners, reading out chunks of text may help but people rarely attempt to go beyond the visual-audio means of learning. There's more to our senses than our eyes and ears; our skin, our muscles can all work in sync with our eyes and ears help us to remember things. There is a reason why big events tend to stick to our minds more than small events - those events are big because they arouse more of our senses, we see, smell, hear, anticipate, feel through our skin and react to them through our muscles and thoughts. That's why it's so hard to remember a chunk of exchanges perhaps in Macbeth if one don't feel for the characters or comprehend the context of the story in the first place (insufficient arousal to our senses). The principle of having more information to anchor new ideas works the same - understanding the circumstances where a poem was written and the background of a poet naturally helps you remember the poem better (not to mention the rhymes and choice of words which are designed to introduce patterns that our minds can recognise more easily and thus recall).

Thus, to help yourself memorize stuff, pick up things that help arouse more of your senses: read aloud as you look through your notes, process them in your mind and write them in more concise or condensed forms on a piece of paper all at the same time. This way, you remember the words you read, the things your hear, the different reactions your mind produce to the things you read and the muscle actions involved in penning down the concise form of the things you're trying to remember. You may not progress as fast in terms of covering content when you do this compared to just plain reading, but the effect of memory is so significant you will soon realize that multiple reading of the same material is no longer justified with such intense 'memorizing'. In tech speak, the amount of bandwidth each senses can offer as a gateway to the mind is limited and to expand this bandwidth and thus increase retention in our mind, there's a need to use other channels, other senses.

To reinforce the stuff 'memorized', one could use mindmaps to surface connections between the things read and absorb after the studying process I prescribed above. The mindmap is to help you see more clearly the big picture of the disparate information you've been trying to take in. It reviews things you've learnt and bring to your attention some stuff you might have missed out and have to relook. The mindmap can be tossed aside after use (I recommend just trashing it) since its use is limited once it's satisfactorily formed.

This article might be a little too late considering people are almost done with O Levels and A Levels now but hopefully, students who are still studying and moving on to higher level educations would find this useful.

5Nov/09Off

Inner Economist

By Kevin

Carrot or Sticks?

Carrot or Sticks?

I have seen this book around for a while but didn't bother to pick it up to read since it didn't quite seem to be as interesting as the other popular economics books that was published during those times. I decided to borrow it from the library having discovered that I've more or less finished the other the popular economics books (though the most recent SuperFreakonomics is out of my reach at the moment). Interestingly, I didn't realise "Discover Your Inner Economist" is written by Tyler Cowen until I got home and took a good look at the cover page. It was definitely a familiar name since I visited Marginal Revolution before and seen the name lingering around the title of almost all the entries there.

I didn't jump right into reading the book this time; instead, I went on to read a book review of "Discover Your Inner Economist" before heading to reading. I've become more conscious about devoting my time to reading books that wouldn't contribute much to my intellectual development. In addition, I was exploring exactly how professionals write book reviews (something I've been doing and very keen on improving). And to my surprise, Tyler Cowen was trying to make recommendations for people to do efficient reading (or rather maximize gains from reading):

The best sections of the book concern tactics for maximizing one’s cultural consumption, or what amounts to imitating Cowen. He lists eight strategies for taking control of one’s reading, which include ruthless skipping around, following one character while ignoring others, and even going directly to the last chapter. Your eighth-grade English teacher would faint.

Not that I've tried that on Tyler Cowen's book. His book focuses on stuff that makes your life better that have little to do with money or material gains for that matter. Tyler writes as if he is speaking and Inner Economist have been an easy read for me although I have to admit Tyler strays into topics so far from traditional economics that I get lost in his narration about appreciation of culture and the human psyche. It makes me wonder if I might have enjoyed the book better with the rampant skipping about chapters and reading just here and there as he advised since I'd be equally lost anyways.

Did I mention that his last strategy for maximizing cultural consumption is to "Give Up"? I did consider that at some point of time but since I had more time and attention to spare than Professor Tyler I decided not to. Discover Your Inner Economist is very much more about looking at reality from the lens of an inner self who have better grasp of reality and more objectivity than the 'you' who participates in this reality. So if you've time to spare, do give Tyler a chance.

3Nov/09Off

Stressed? Just Smile!

By Kevin

What Stress?

What Stress?

I just finished The Economic Naturalist by Robert H Frank a couple of days back and one of the questions was why managers who believed in achieving improvements in performance of subordinates through threats and reprimand rather than praise and reward were more likely to be able to prove that they are right.

Professor Frank suggests that it was because the performance of people usually varies with time but stays the same on average without special effort to improve or skive. That means that when a person perform badly it could just be his particularly down period and after getting scolded from the manager his performance tend to return towards the mean and result in the improved performance the manager was hoping for. On the contrary, a person may perform exceptionally on an especially good day and get praised for his work only to have his performance return to its mean, which means poorer than before the manager's rewards/praise. A manager who believes praise and reward yields better returns would thus have little means of proving he is right and so is unfairly proven wrong.

The truth seems more complex than just that. As this article from Harvard Business Review suggests, sensitivity to the anger or happiness of the manager or boss depends partly to the stress levels experienced. So from the perspective of the employer or manager, it is wise to inject more praise and rewards during high stress periods. Never mind the low stress periods when employers are slacking around.

Human behaviours and the motivations behind them are great subjects to study. This gives me the chance to introduce the publication, Psychology Today, which recently featured something really useful for people working in the business world (and perhaps even in academia). Confidence in yourself and your ideas really counts when it comes to presentations. So you will really have to work on yourself to get your ideas accepted. Check out the publication site for more of such tips to help discipline, aid and make sense of your mind.

25Oct/09Off

Welcome the Sciences!

By Kevin

Mixing Stuff Around

Mixing Stuff Around

During the ERPZ break, our links did more than re-organize themselves; some additional reads were added and in particular, stuff about science and technology. They're the sites of science magazines, Popular Science, New Scientist, Nature and Scientific American.

Not only would articles and materials from these sites be helpful to those curious about scientific developments, they're surprisingly useful for students of GP when tackling science and technology questions. New Scientist sometimes evaluate technologies, Scientific American provides insights into not only latest developments of science but also effects of older developments.

With regards to study methods, an area that ERPZ constantly explores, Popular Science is quoting scientific findings that support our conventional wisdom and making prescriptions for our lifestyle. Of course, for those students who are totally into sciences, you might be interested in what Nature has to offer.

And there's more; the all-pervading nature of Economics means that these science magazines can't help but mention at least a little things related to the subject - the most obvious being this article from Scientific American. Businessmen and economics students definitely loves to know more about technological advancements' impact on economies and business models as evident from The Economist.

1Oct/09Off

Cost of Being Easy-going

By Kevin

If you're easy-going, and the story here sounds rather familiar to you; take comfort that you're on the right path and life is going to work out well for you.

When you were going out for a snack and your mum makes you run an errand to some supermarket further up the street to get some rice? Being easygoing you decided to agree and seeing that, your sister tells you to pass a parcel to her boyfriend who lives in the next street. You might as well, since you're not exactly carrying anything for now. You carry the bulky parcel and pass the snack shop, thinking you should get the snack later; you go up to your sister's boyfriend's place and ring the bell - no one answers.

You wonder why you even agreed to walk an extra 100m or so to get rice for your mum in the first place. You called your sister and she says you'll have to wait for about 10 minutes for her boyfriend to reach home so you decided to wait, now regreting that you didn't get the snack before arriving at the place. Her boyfriend comes, and took the parcel and tried to tip you but you kindly declined.

You reach the supermarket only to realise that there's only 10kg sized rice left on the shelves and your mum confirms that she'll need you to buy it anyways because there's no more rice at home. You lug the 10kg nylon sack and pass the snack store, drag the sack into the store to get your snack. The miser boss says he has no change and you will either have to sacrifice your change or walk away without the snack if you don't have the right amount. Only then, you realised you should have accepted the tip from your sister's boyfriend.

Back at home your mum and sister thank you, but you wonder if your efforts should have earned you much more than a word of thanks. The overpriced snack don't quite serve as consolation either.

I spent some time wondering, why do people who are easy-going always end up getting on the bad end of every deal while those fussy snobs always gets to go scot free from work, hassle, errands and trouble? I'm not exactly easygoing but I found that in any environment, relatively easygoing people almost always definitely end up doing the bulk of the work and suffer from the majority of necessary trouble.

Use a prop to vent it

Use a prop to vent it

I grew up in a family with a fussy sister who is picky about food, particular about cleanliness and extremely paranoid about people moving her stuff around. And most of the time, I'm 'forced' to give in, letting her eat the rare stuff she loves to eat (despite those being my favourites too) and making way on our common table for her stuff. Using her powerful tools of complaining, whining and sometimes weeping, she pushes work, chores and various little errands around and often over to me.

Yes, so why? It turns out that applying economic thinking about incentives works great on this matter. When you're easygoing, you have less incentives than others to push chores/work away to others; in other words, you would rather do the work yourself than spend the effort trying to find someone else to settle it. For those who are fussy and going all out to slack, they'd have more incentives to force someone else to take up the chore; they'd rather sacrifice a friendship, be unpopular amongst their friends and waste energy flaring up than to do the work themselves. There, you've got the equilibrium - the slacker spends his energy-emotion currency convincing the easygoing dude to do chore while the easygoing dude expends his energy-emotion currency to complete the task.

Alternative outcomes are usually worse off for both parties. In an event when the easygoing guy accidentally manages to push the chore to the slacker; the slacker ends up feeling frustrated, does a bad job, complain wildly, leaving the easygoing guy feeling guilty, and sad that he upset the slacker.

So if you're easygoing and wondering why you've taken over a chore or duty from your friend who needs to go on a date with his girlfriend, you know you're not entirely losing out.

25Sep/09Off

Proper Perspectives

By Kevin

I was reading The Difference Maker by John C Maxwell. And I thought the following anecdote he gave to illustrate perspectives is really amusing. It takes the form of a letter to a Mom written by her daughter who just went to college.

Dear Mom,
Since I have been away at college, one full semester, I think it's time I bring you up to date as to what is going on. Shortly after I arrived at college, I got bored with dormitory life and stole fifty dollars from my roommate's purse. With the money, I rented a motorcycle, which I crashed into a telephone pole a few blocks from the dorm.

The Bike

I broke my leg in the accident, but I was rescued by the young doctor who lives upstairs in the apartment house on the corner. He took me in, set my leg, nursed me back to health, and thanks to him, I'm up and around again.

We wanted to let you know that we're going to be married as soon as possible. Unfortunately, we're having some trouble with the blood test - they're not sure what the disease is, but it keeps showing up in the test. We hope to get that worked out quickly so that we'll be married before the baby arrives. Shortly thereafter we will all be home to live with you and Dad. And I just know you will learn to love the baby as much as you love me, even though the baby's dad is a different religion and wants us to convert. Please understand, the only reason we're coming back home to stay is that my husband-to-be got tossed out of medical school because he was too busy taking care of me to complete his work.

Really, Mom, I didn't steal any money or rent a motorcycle or hit a telephone pole or break my leg. I didn't meet a young doctor. There's no disease and I'm not expecting a baby. And I won't be coming home to live with you and Dad either. However, I am getting a D in algebra and a F in geology, and I wanted you to accept these grades in their proper perspective!

Learn to adopt the right perspective of things and your life; things could be worst and be glad they turn out the way they did. Learn to correct mistakes if you were wrong and have the courage to bounce back.